Home » Skills
The Charette Procedure
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Have you ever tried to hold a brainstorming
session with more than 10 or 15 people?
Or tried to brainstorm
ideas for two or more related issues?
The results are rarely pretty!
These
sessions quickly spin out of control, becoming chaotic and unproductive.
What's more, they tend to be dominated by only a few people, with
the majority remaining silent.
When an idea-generating session has numerous
related issues or numerous stakeholders, simple brainstorming
is often inadequate. This means that sessions are less creative
than they might be, buy-in is undermined, and people disengage
from the process. This is a serious problem if you need to achieve
consensus.
However, brainstorming can still be effective
if you take a slightly different approach to organizing the brainstorming
sessions.
One such approach has a name: The Charette Procedure
(sometimes spelled 'Charrette'). It involves organizing people
into several small groups, each of which brainstorms ideas one-after-the-other
until everyone involved has had a chance to contribute fully.
Derived from the French word for wagon, it come from the practice
of architecture students in the early 1800s, who used carts to
rush their drawings from one place to another to get final approvals.
In much the same way, when you use the Charette Procedure, you
take the ideas generated by a group, and cart them over to the
next group, for them to be built upon, refined, and finally prioritized.
The Charette Procedure allows for maximum participation
in idea generation, without compromising the quality or effectiveness
of the brainstorming. The benefits of the process include:
Effective use of time because many issues
can be discussed at the same time.
Improved buy-in from stakeholders, who have
the opportunity to contribute their ideas on each issue.
Encouragement of high quality options because
the most popular ideas are polished with each round of discussion.
Elimination of stalled discussion, because
new people can progress an issue on each round.
How to Use the Tool
The Charette Procedure is quite simple to apply. Depending on your situation you may complete the various group discussions in one day, or they can be held over a series of days or weeks. The system you choose will be based on the logistics involved and the size of your project.
Agree on a set of issues that need to be discussed.
Divide your larger group into small groups that are more conducive to brainstorming. As with many types of group interaction, a group size of seven participants plus the recorder is ideal. Here again, the specifics of your situation will dictate the size of your groups. When planning the groups, consider the following:
If you have a set deadline, make sure that the number of groups and iterations can be accommodated within it .
Think about the mix of people within the groups. Groups with a diverse mix of skills, background and experience are generally more creative than those of similarly skilled people.
Make sure that the number of groups is equal to or greater than the number of issues to discuss.
Assign an issue to each group. If there are more groups than issues, then assign some issues to more than one group.
Have each group elect a recorder. You may also suggest this person facilitates the group discussion as well.
Each group brainstorms an issue.
Record all ideas, as for regular brainstorming , and follow the rules of normal brainstorming.
Set a time limit for discussion. This will depend heavily on your overall schedule, as well as on the complexity of the issues being discussed. Strike a balance between excessively short sessions that might not uncover enough detail, and longer discussions that might lose focus.
When the group's time is up, the recorder moves to the next group.
The recorder reviews the issues and
current state of the brainstorming list with the new group.
Brainstorming begins again, with each
group now discussing a new idea or issue. The new group
builds on the existing ideas and generates new one.
Repeat this step until each group has
discussed each issue once.
In the final group session, allow time to
organize and draw together the ideas into key ideas, themes
or strands. If several groups have been working at the same
time on the same issue, this is a good time to bring together
the different streams of ideas.
Once the final session has finished, reconvene
the whole group and have the recorders present their lists.
This is a good time to work with the group to prioritize issues
or approaches, if this is appropriate. Techniques that can help
you do this are:
Nominal Group Technique .
Multi-Voting .
Key Points
The Charette Procedure is an efficient and effective process for brainstorming and capturing ideas, when there are multiple issues to discuss and many people involved. It is a systemic and organized approach that allows everyone to contribute in a meaningful way. When you are faced with a complex, multiplayer decision, the Charette Procedure is a great way of identifying the options available, and laying the foundations of well-considered and widely accepted plans.
Tags:
Creativity, Creativity Techniques, Skills
session with more than 10 or 15 people?
Or tried to brainstorm
ideas for two or more related issues?
The results are rarely pretty!
These
sessions quickly spin out of control, becoming chaotic and unproductive.
What's more, they tend to be dominated by only a few people, with
the majority remaining silent.
When an idea-generating session has numerous
related issues or numerous stakeholders, simple brainstorming
is often inadequate. This means that sessions are less creative
than they might be, buy-in is undermined, and people disengage
from the process. This is a serious problem if you need to achieve
consensus.
However, brainstorming can still be effective
if you take a slightly different approach to organizing the brainstorming
sessions.
One such approach has a name: The Charette Procedure
(sometimes spelled 'Charrette'). It involves organizing people
into several small groups, each of which brainstorms ideas one-after-the-other
until everyone involved has had a chance to contribute fully.
Derived from the French word for wagon, it come from the practice
of architecture students in the early 1800s, who used carts to
rush their drawings from one place to another to get final approvals.
In much the same way, when you use the Charette Procedure, you
take the ideas generated by a group, and cart them over to the
next group, for them to be built upon, refined, and finally prioritized.
The Charette Procedure allows for maximum participation
in idea generation, without compromising the quality or effectiveness
of the brainstorming. The benefits of the process include:
Effective use of time because many issues
can be discussed at the same time.
Improved buy-in from stakeholders, who have
the opportunity to contribute their ideas on each issue.
Encouragement of high quality options because
the most popular ideas are polished with each round of discussion.
Elimination of stalled discussion, because
new people can progress an issue on each round.
How to Use the Tool
The Charette Procedure is quite simple to apply. Depending on your situation you may complete the various group discussions in one day, or they can be held over a series of days or weeks. The system you choose will be based on the logistics involved and the size of your project.
Agree on a set of issues that need to be discussed.
Divide your larger group into small groups that are more conducive to brainstorming. As with many types of group interaction, a group size of seven participants plus the recorder is ideal. Here again, the specifics of your situation will dictate the size of your groups. When planning the groups, consider the following:
If you have a set deadline, make sure that the number of groups and iterations can be accommodated within it .
Think about the mix of people within the groups. Groups with a diverse mix of skills, background and experience are generally more creative than those of similarly skilled people.
Make sure that the number of groups is equal to or greater than the number of issues to discuss.
Assign an issue to each group. If there are more groups than issues, then assign some issues to more than one group.
Have each group elect a recorder. You may also suggest this person facilitates the group discussion as well.
Each group brainstorms an issue.
Record all ideas, as for regular brainstorming , and follow the rules of normal brainstorming.
Set a time limit for discussion. This will depend heavily on your overall schedule, as well as on the complexity of the issues being discussed. Strike a balance between excessively short sessions that might not uncover enough detail, and longer discussions that might lose focus.
When the group's time is up, the recorder moves to the next group.
The recorder reviews the issues and
current state of the brainstorming list with the new group.
Brainstorming begins again, with each
group now discussing a new idea or issue. The new group
builds on the existing ideas and generates new one.
Repeat this step until each group has
discussed each issue once.
In the final group session, allow time to
organize and draw together the ideas into key ideas, themes
or strands. If several groups have been working at the same
time on the same issue, this is a good time to bring together
the different streams of ideas.
Once the final session has finished, reconvene
the whole group and have the recorders present their lists.
This is a good time to work with the group to prioritize issues
or approaches, if this is appropriate. Techniques that can help
you do this are:
Nominal Group Technique .
Multi-Voting .
Key Points
The Charette Procedure is an efficient and effective process for brainstorming and capturing ideas, when there are multiple issues to discuss and many people involved. It is a systemic and organized approach that allows everyone to contribute in a meaningful way. When you are faced with a complex, multiplayer decision, the Charette Procedure is a great way of identifying the options available, and laying the foundations of well-considered and widely accepted plans.
